[quote="Funkman"]קודם כל, קראתי בעיון את החומר. וקראתי את הדברים שכתבת לא פעם בפורום.
ובגלל זה חלק מההודעה שלך(שהשקעת בה המון) לא חידשה לי את מה שאתה ואנשים אחרים בפורום כבר חידשו לי.

ציטוט:

לא ביקשתי טבלאות. ביקשתי ספר שמסביר על תורת גלי הקול, על אקוסטיקה ואולי על עוד דברים בנושא שאני צריך לדעת כדי שתהיה לי הבנה מלאה בעניין.

"Havana Me'le'a" - get a degree.
Luckily for most home studios you don't always need the "havana me'le'a", you can get pretty far with a superficial understanding.
In reality to design a studio in an intelligent manner, you rely upon 4 tools:
1. Experience.
2. Knowledge.
3. Measurements.
4. Computer models.
Experience - that's up to you.
Knowledge - I believe you can get by rather well with what you learn on the Internet. Some of the guides are not bad at all, check out Ethan Wiener's acoustics FAQ (forgot the link, but try a search on Google).
3. Measurements - learning the art of acoustical measurements is not *that* hard. Much easier than learning acoustics, that's for sure .
4. Computer models - today there are several good programs for simulating room acoustics. You don't need a degree in physics to understand them, you can usually get by with the superficial knowledge in (2).

ציטוט:

כשאמרתי שאני רוצה שיהיו בו נוסחאות, הכוונה שלי הייתה שזה לא יהיה ספר שמנסה להיות "הספר בלי המתמטיקה"(יש הרבה כאלה, או לפחות הרבה באינטרנט).

I am not aware of any technical book for non-engineers in this field.
Did you try Everest's "Master Handbook of Acoustics"?

ציטוט:

כלומר, אני לא מפחד כשאני רואה נוסחאות, ואין לי בעיה שיהיו נוסחאות.

Be afraid ... be very afraid ...
There is a fundamental difference in science between _understanding_ something and _working_ with it. For example, suppose you want to study the properties of a certain solid. To _understand_ it you would build a highly simplified model that highlights those aspects you'd like to understand. Any results obtained by studying that model would usually not be accurate so couldn't be used in real time.
In practical situations you need to develop ways of measuring parameters you're interested in. For example, you first define (in an operative way) the absorption coefficient and then set out to measure it. You cannot always _understand_ the results because the material may be too complicated to analyze with models/equations, but you _do_ know what they mean _operationally_ )(e.g., a coefficient of 0.4 would mean 40% of the energy is absorbed,)

So a _fundamental_ understanding of what goes on in wave-matter interaction is definitely not a must. Maybe if you're a materials-engineer, but not if you're an acoustician.

In simpler words: equations aren't always the best way of understanding something. In fact they can be your worst enemy since they help you mask your lack of understanding with neat and ordered expressions (I'm talking about myself, from experience).

העיצות בפורום באמת עוזרות, אבל אני רוצה להבין את הנושא עד כמה שאפשר. בלי שום כוונה נסתרת להיות בונה אולפנים.

First o fall what's wrong with "building studios"?
Sounds fine to me if you enjoy it.
If you're not afraid of the math I'd go with "Fundamentals of Acoustics" by Kinsler and Frey (4th edition). I'd also get a copy of Crocker's "Encyclopedia of Acoustics". Both are on sale in Amazon.com, *but* please do yourself and favor and check them out in your nearest university's library to see if they fit you.

Regards,
Assaf.